Founding beta is freeStart

INTEGRATIONS

It stands on their
form, not instead of you.

The browser companion fills an employer’s application form with answers you have already approved, and then stops. Filled by applywise, sent by you.

Example
PLAYABLE33 · COMPANION-FILL

Try to make it lie.

An employer’s form, in your browser. Press Fill and the fields it has evidence for populate in sequence. Press it on the ninth and it refuses, with a reason. Submit is drawn, enabled, and only ever pressed by you.

APPLICATION FORM · EXAMPLE8 of 8 filled
  1. Full nameFrom your Career Twin
  2. EmailFrom your account
  3. PhoneFrom your Career Twin
  4. LocationAmsterdam, Netherlands
  5. Current titleFrom your confirmed history
  6. Years in roleFrom your confirmed history
  7. Right to workThe answer you approved once
  8. Notice periodThe answer you approved once
  9. Why this company, specifically?YOUOne sentence only you can write

IT WILL NOT FILL THISNothing in your history answers this. Guessing would put a sentence in your name that you did not write.

Submit is yours. The companion has no code path that reaches it.

Filled by applywise, sent by you. Press Fill to take the form.

FOUR STAGES

What the companion actually does.

It is a browser extension, not a bot with your password. It cannot act while you are not there.

BEFORE THE FORM

Prose becomes structure.

A posting is written to attract and read to filter. ApplyWise does the structured reading before an approved packet reaches the companion.

Example
11 · POSTING-DISSOLVINGOne paragraph, five requirements

We are looking for someone to own the roadmap for our payments platform and work with three engineering teams to ship it. You bring a test-and-learn mindset and are comfortable pulling your own numbers. Time in a regulated environment is a plus.

Roadmap ownershipfrom “own the roadmap”Cross-team deliveryfrom “work with three engineering teams”Experimentationfrom “a test-and-learn mindset”Regulated domainfrom “a regulated environment”SQLfrom “pull your own numbers”

Five requirements out of a paragraph that named none of them as requirements. What it cannot resolve stays prose rather than becoming a guess.

Five requirements come out of a paragraph that named none of them as requirements. That resolution is what makes the rest possible: you cannot fill a form against prose, and you cannot score a fit against an adjective.

  • Every chip traces to a phrase in the posting
  • What it cannot resolve is left as prose, not guessed
  • Nothing is inferred from the company name

What it does with them is in the career library.

THE FORM ITSELF

Twenty-four fields, one of them yours.

This is the thing the companion is for. Not the technology — the twenty-three fields you have already typed this month.

AN EMPLOYER’S FORM, AS IT ARRIVES24 fields
Twenty-four fields, and you have typed twenty-three of them before. The one at the bottom is the only one worth your evening. Example form shape, not any employer’s page.
ON AN EMPLOYER'S FORM
Filled
name, history, the approved answers
1
left for you — only you can answer it
0
sent by the companion
You
press submit

COMPATIBILITY

Recognised fields, with you present.

PLANNED PROVIDER VALIDATION
WorkdayGreenhouseLeverSmartRecruitersPersonioRecruitee

These provider names are roadmap targets, not verified adapters or a coverage claim.

The current companion uses generic recognised-field matching on HTTPS application pages. It fills only supported fields after your action and hands you the rest rather than guessing. No named provider adapter is represented as verified here.

Their form asks two things I have no evidence for. I have left them for you.

  • Runs in your browser, on your session
  • Only fills answers you approved
  • Never submits, on any site

What it can reach is covered in Security.