CAREER LIBRARY
Questions to ask
of a role.
Static editorial starting points for reading a role. This public page does not inspect live postings, outcomes or your Career Twin.
Check whether the posting asks for prioritisation decisions and what evidence could support them.
Check whether SQL is required, preferred or absent in the exact posting.
Check whether the role asks for designing, interpreting or acting on experiments.
Check whether domain experience is a must-have, a preference or not mentioned.
Example review prompts, not measured requirement frequency. Load a real posting for its current requirements.
WHAT A GUIDE HOLDS
Four editorial starting points.
The guides are static. They are not fed by the vacancy catalogue, outcomes or a candidate profile.
Requirement prompts
Questions to verify against the exact posting.
Salary evidence
What stated pay evidence to look for before drawing a conclusion.
Source check
Whether listings share a company, title and location. No filled-role inference.
Gap prompt
One capability to inspect after the posting and candidate facts are available.
THE SCORE
Operate the engine.
A fit score you cannot take apart is a number somebody is asking you to trust. This one comes apart.
Take a fact away.
Five requirements on the left, one candidate’s facts on the right, links drawn between them. Remove any fact and its link retracts, the score recomputes, and the requirement it served goes unmatched with a label saying so.
- Roadmap ownership
- Experimentation
- Regulated domain
- Cross-team delivery
- SQLNo fact supports this
No fact supports “SQL”. That link stays undrawn, and the score says so rather than rounding up.
Range on this example: 58 to 92, depending on what you remove. Click a fact to take the controls.
This control is an example of how linked evidence affects a score. It does not know who you are. Personal assessment requires one selected posting and candidate-confirmed facts.
In this example, no fact supports SQL. The link stays undrawn and the example score stays lower.
- Example links are visible
- An unsupported example stays unmatched
- No personal score on this public page
Where the facts come from is on how it works.
SALARY
Salary evidence, when available.
No salary distribution is connected to this public guide. The empty state avoids inventing one.
A selected posting may state a range. This public guide does not turn one range into a market distribution or a personal salary position.
Load a real posting to compare its stated pay with your own guardrails.
- No salary dataset attached
- No city or seniority distribution inferred
- Missing measurements stay empty
THE TWO NUMBERS
Neither is measured here.
This static guide has no runtime catalogue or candidate population data.
NOT_MEASURED on this public route. No requirement-frequency series is connected.
A candidate-supply percentage would require a defined, observed population. No such source is connected, so no comparison is drawn.
- No second series
- No purchased dataset standing in for one
NOT_MEASURED. This public guide has no observed candidate population.
DUPLICATE RECORDS
A source check, not a live count.
This guide does not inspect provider records or infer that a role is filled.
No provider-record series is connected to this public guide. Matching company, title and location is only a deduplication rule.
This public guide does not canonicalize or count records at runtime. The product can merge matching company, title and location records, but it does not yet identify already-filled roles or infer ghosts.
No lifecycle measurement is connected. The missing series stays empty.
- Static deduplication rule explained
- No filled-role or ghost inference
- No rate quoted before there is a cycle to count
THE GUIDES
Six static editorial starting points.
Product manager
Payments · Amsterdam
Read the guide →Data analyst
SaaS · remote EU
Read the guide →Instructional designer
Education · hybrid
Read the guide →Customer success lead
B2B · Amsterdam
Read the guide →Backend engineer
Fintech · remote
Read the guide →Operations manager
Logistics · Rotterdam
Read the guide →These public guides have no candidate context. For a personal assessment, load a real posting and compare it with candidate-confirmed history.